Wire tapping without a warrant is illegal ... Doh!
The most relevant precedent is United States v. United States District Court (Keith). Decided in 1972, Kieth involved a prosecution for conspiracy to blow-up a CIA office. The Executive argued that in order “to gather intelligence information” that was “necessary to protect the nation from attempts . . . to attack and subvert the existing structure of the Government,” it was constitutionally entitled to engage in electronic surveillance of American citizens without complying with the requirements of the Fourth Amendment. In Kieth, the Supreme Court unanimously and unequivocally held that, even in national security investigations, the President had no constitutional authority to conduct electronic surveillance of American citizens on American soil without a judicially issued search warrant based on a finding of probable cause. link
1 Comments:
I guess the Ames investigation during Clinton's first term was OK?
How about in 1994 when Clinton announced at a press conference that he would authorize warrantless surveillance of particularly violent government housing projects? Was that OK as well?
Post a Comment
<< Home